- This topic has 4 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated November 2, 2020 at 2:29 pm by .
-
Topic
-
By Shimshon Bichler & Jonathan Nitzan
Most critiques of conventional economics focus on the larger arguments. They claim that mainstream economic ideas are ‘removed from reality’, that they emphasize ‘rationality’ and ignore other drives, that they rely on ‘equilibrium’ instead of instability, that they accentuate ‘harmony’ instead of exploitation and power, etc.
But there is another way to look at these questions, and that is to examine the words that mainstream economists use – as well as those they ignore. And that’s what political economist Blair Fix has done in his highly original piece ‘Deconstructing Econospeak’ https://economicsfromthetopdown.com/2020/10/30/deconstructing-econospeak/
The paper is the result of many weeks of clever programming, strategic thinking and plenty of trial and error, which Blair describes in an earlier paper, ‘Working With Google Ngrams: A Data-Wrangling Tale’ https://economicsfromthetopdown.com/2020/10/19/working-with-google-ngrams-a-data-wrangling-tale/
And the results are fascinating.
The figure below is one of many examples. The chart illustrates the extent to which mainstream economics ignores words related to power: most of these words are either neglected or underrepresented, both absolutely and relatively to their general use in the English language. And without the words to describe it, power disappears.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.