- This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated April 30, 2021 at 4:14 am by .
Have you came across Öcalan’s attempt to break with traditional Marxist theory? Though in crude lines, it seems to share the general thrust of conceptualizing capitalism as a mode of power. This literature is being read by the political community affiliated with the autonomous project of Rojava.
Here is an excerpt from Manifesto for a Democratic Civilization [Vol.2] (p.120):
Capitalism is not economy but power
The insight that capitalism is not economy should lead to a work at least the magnitude of Das Kapital. Let me say outright that the ideas I will express here have nothing to do with power reductionism. Neither will I accept any criticism that I am linking capitalism (in terms of it being an economy) with the state. What I am talking about here is the formation of a political power that controls the economy but is conceptualized as “capitalism,” “capitalist,” and “capitalist economy.” This power became influential for the first time in sixteenth century Europe and later became the true dominant political power in the Netherlands and England under the aforementioned labels. That it makes use of economy does not affirm that it is economical in character. Fernand Braudel openly states that capitalism is antimarket, a monopolist plunder externally imposed on the economy, and he is the first sociologist and historian to have realized it. Although he is aware of having ruined one of the creeds of European thought, he is unable to put it into words. The question then arises: What is this thing that externally imposes itself, that is anti-market and not economy? The answer to the question is yet insufficient. Is it a political power, religion, or a school of thought?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.