Problems With Measuring Inequality

Originally published on Economics from the Top Down Blair Fix Economists often talk about income inequality the same way a doctor would talk about a child’s height. Just as a doctor would say “Sylvia continues to grow taller”, economists say things like “US income inequality continues to grow”. (Full disclosure, I’m sure I’ve said similar […]

What If Scientific Impact Could Be Negative?

Originally published on Economics from the Top Down Blair Fix Scientists live and die by their scientific ‘impact’. For the uninitiated, ‘impact’ is a measure of a scientist’s contribution to their field. While there are many measures of scientific impact, almost all of them focus (in some way) on citations. So if more people cite […]

Are We Measuring Inequality the Wrong Way?

Originally published on Economics from the Top Down Blair Fix In a recent blog post called “How Not to Measure Inequality”, the anthropologist Jason Hickel argues that economists measure inequality the wrong way. Hickel thinks that standard measures of inequality (such as the Gini index), underestimate global disparities. The problem, according to Hickel, is that […]

Can A Service Transition Save the Planet?

Originally published on Economics from the Top Down Blair Fix Let’s talk sustainability. Unless you’re an anti-science crank, you probably agree that we’ve got a problem with carbon emissions. We need to drastically cut emissions to avoid catastrophic climate change. On this we should all agree. The question that’s open for debate is how to […]

Visualizing Power-Law Distributions

Originally published on Economics from the Top Down Blair Fix In this post we’re going to take a journey into the world of power-law distributions. Power laws pop up again and again in my research. But I’ve never taken the time to discuss what makes them so weird. This post will be a little ‘power-law […]

The Autocatalytic Sprawl of Pseudorational Mastery

The Autocatalytic Sprawl of Pseudorational Mastery ULF MARTIN May 2019 Abstract According to Jonathan Nitzan and Shimshon Bichler (2009), capital is not an economic quantity, but a mode of power. Their fundamental thesis could be summarized as follows: capital is power quantified in monetary terms. But what do we do when we quantify? What is […]

Agent-Based Models and the Ghost in the Machine

Originally published on Economics from the Top Down Blair Fix In the opening post of this blog, I described my ‘top-down’ approach to studying society. This means studying groups of people without trying to reduce everything to the actions of individuals. It’s not that I think individual actions are unimportant. Of course they are important. […]

Review of Capital as Power

Articles Capital as Power in the 21st Century A Conversation Michael Hudson, Jonathan Nitzan, Tim Di Muzio, and Blair Fix February 2025 Manuscripts Don’t Burn Shimshon Bichler and Jonathan Nitzan September 2023 The Capital as Power Approach An Invited-then-Rejected Interview with Shimshon Bichler and Jonathan Nitzan Shimshon Bichler and Jonathan Nitzan September 2023 The Business […]

Review of Capital as Power

Peer Review The Review of Capital as Power practices double-blind peer review. Neither the author nor the referees are known to one another. Each manuscript is reviewed by two referees. If the reviewers disagree, we may consult a third referee. Reviewers should focus on constructive commentary that will help authors strengthen their article. We ask […]

Review of Capital as Power

Submission Guidelines To submit an article, please email your manuscript to blairfix@fastmail.com with the subject ‘RECASP submission’. Manuscripts should be sent as a PDF file. Anonymous Peer Review The Review of Capital as Power practices double-blind peer review. To facilitate review, please send two versions of your manuscript: Version 1: includes author information (including a […]

Review of Capital as Power

Review of Capital as Power The Review of Capital as Power (RECASP) is a non-disciplinary, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the study of capital and capitalism. The journal invites contributions that engage with the idea of ‘capital as power’ – namely, the notion that capital is a symbolic quantification of organized power, and that capitalism as […]

About

Capital as Power This site explores the idea of ‘capital as power’, a radical approach to political economy that conceives ‘capital’ as a symbolic quantification of power. Our goal is to foster debate about received wisdom in political economy. As such, we conceive capital-as-power research as non-disciplinary. Contributions from any scientific background are welcome. Our […]